+7 (495) 123-33-36 info@vlasta-s.com Weekdays: 9:30 a.m. - 6 p.m.
VLASTACONSULTING Business Security
Corporate security

Corporate disputes

The Client suspected that employees of its Russian representation colluded with organizations that the Client supplied. Our team proved these suspicions correct, exposed the scheme and drafted a strategy that helped the Client to resolve the situation.…

PracticeCorporate security
RegionRussia · CIS · EAEU
OutcomeNo litigation, no losses

Collusion between staff and suppliers was resolved internally — without litigation costs or reputational damage.

01Situation

The Client suspected that employees of its Russian representation colluded with organizations that the Client supplied. Our team proved these suspicions correct, exposed the scheme and drafted a strategy that helped the Client to resolve the situation. Although the authorities became aware of the scheme taking place, the Client didn’t encounter any negative legal ramifications and continued doing business in Russia.

02Problem

A major manufacturer of high-tech engineering equipment received troubling reports from its local office. Apparently, the representation filed inaccurate financial data, which made the client suspect a double game having taken place in its local sales department consisting of several managers.

03Solution

First of all, the team retrieved information about the sales department and evaluated key managers who were connected to business processes that alerted the client.

Forensics measures that followed allowed narrowing down the searches to those managers who actually colluded with third parties unbeknownst to the head office. Additional checks allowed assessing a possibility of the involvement of each manager in improper practices.

Two sales managers had apparent expenditure that didn’t meet their income in the client’s company, implying external sources of wealth. Further checks showed that they indeed abused corporate practices that not only resulted in shortfall in profits but also put the client’s positions on the local market in jeopardy.

The scheme involved overpricing and kickbacks legalized through a fake investment contract. Moreover, information indicated possible improper interactions between the distributor involved in the scheme and customs officials, as well as tax evasion.

04Outcome

As soon as client discontinued his business with this distributor, the scheme collapsed. A company that colluded with the client’s managers could no longer sustain the improper practices; related proceedings were suspended for several years. The client cleared himself off suspicions that he anyhow favored these practices. Subsequent proceedings revealed tens of millions of dollars in underpaid taxes, while the client remained intact.

Case topics

corporate disputesstaff collusionkickbacksdistributortax violationsengineering equipment

Get in touch

We will hold a confidential consultation on your brief.